Wednesday, January 27, 2010

గణాంకాల మాటున గడసరి తనం - ప్రొ. లక్ష్మణ్ , ఉస్మానియా విశ్వవిద్యాలయం . వ్యాసం ...

.
.
ఇవాళ్టి " ఆంద్ర జ్యోతి " దినపత్రికలో ఉస్మానియా విశ్వవిద్యాలయం ప్రొ. లక్ష్మణ్ రాసిన "గణాంకాల మాటున గడసరి తనం" అనేక వాస్తవాలను వెల్లడించింది. చదవని వారి కోసం దానిని ఇక్కడ పొందుపరుస్తున్నాను. ఆంద్ర జ్యోతికి , ప్రొ. లక్ష్మణ్ గారికి ధన్యవాదాలు.


దీనితో పాటు ఈ కింది లింకును కూడా చదివితే మరింత ఉపయుక్తంగా వుంటుంది.
తెలంగాణా ఆకాంక్షల చరిత్ర

.

7 comments:

  1. That is why the issue be refered to 2SRC for a genuenity of these claims by both parties.

    It makes sense if there is some disparity in the river water distribution and Jobs.

    But all other issues are baseless and no one need to look into the jealous remarks based on regional hatred.

    What effort Telangana politicians has been doing all these years?! Why these politicians didn't raise the issues while they were Ministers in the cabinet?! Why didn't you move your justified issues with Prime minister PV.Narasimha Rao? Has anyone moved? Where was these TRS, JAC, T-congress guys were, then?

    Whatever, with violence & hatred you will never achieve Telangana in a democratic country.
    If you are fighting for seperate state , that is up to you!

    Telangana was liberated by Police action 'Operation Polo'. I think you are inviting one more such action, with your hatread & senseless statements.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When 1st SRC itself is not implemented with true spirit then where is the question of 2nd SRC?

    And why the 2nd SRC was not formed till date even though the Congress party made the promise in its 2004 Election Manifesto?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ravi,
    AP was formed as per 1st SRC whether you agree or not. Did KCR ask for 2SRC when he was minister in UPA? It won't be formed every year as you may be thinking! If there is a dispute (unlike in the cases of other smaller states) it would be setteled only by a technical committee that would look into claims and give a sensible solution.

    I wonder if anyone still believing manifestos in this country and that too Congress manifestos! :)) Anyway , which manifesto you kept your hopes on? :)) in 2004 or 2009? Fight for sensible issues if you are so desperate, but not attacking Cinema industry, RTC, business industries for 'COLLECTIONS' by TRS & co.

    It is wise to get whatever is undisputed first and negotiate for the disputed, if really is someone serious about seperation. Hyderabad is disputed being common capital for over 50years. Don't talk Nizam's rule of 200yrs anr further go back in time till Satavahanas to support your claim. 50yrs is mor than 2generations talk present don't blaber on history and thus diluting the present problem. Puzzle Ali , Asaf Ali, Nehru , Tom Dick & Harry might have talked so many things.. including Lady Mountbaten! It has no relevance to the present after 5decades. If I were to be in that position, I would have asked for seperation of undisputed districts leaving Hyderabad as disputed to negotiate. That would be sensible. Anyway over 101,000 sq.kms of Hyderabad State was lost to Maharashtra & Karnataka during 1st SRC and this time Hyderabad won't be lost but atmost some financial package. It's ok, Center would help in that.
    Otherwise any way TIME TESTED( for 53years) option of violent/ verbal onslaught is there.. to hang-on for another 47years to make it century like in the case of Vidharba etc.!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kudos to "S"...

    People need to think wisely and settle down this issue..rather making provocative statements ...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Agree with the above 2 comments.

    Mahatma Gandhi has asked to dissolve the congress party and should not be a political party in free India. It hasn't happened. Should we make it a big scene now and dissolve it !? Does it make any sense !?

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. మందార గారు,

    మీ బ్లాగులో మీ వయసు షురారు గా ఎంత ఉంట్టుందో చెప్తె చాలా బాగా ఉంట్టుంది. మీ బ్లాగు చదివే వారికి మీ మీద ఒక అవగాహన ఎర్పరచు కుంట్టారు.

    ReplyDelete